In: health, science.

Viruses

From Wikipedia: A virus is a submicroscopic infectious agent that replicates only inside the living cells of an organism. Viruses infect all life forms, from animals and plants to microorganisms, including bacteria and archaea. Since Dmitri Ivanovsky’s 1892 article describing a non-bacterial pathogen infecting tobacco plants and the discovery of the tobacco mosaic virus by Martinus Beijerinck in 1898, more than 9,000 virus species have been described in detail of the millions of types of viruses in the environment. Viruses are found in almost every ecosystem on Earth and are the most numerous type of biological entity.

From Wikipedia: A virus is a tiny infectious agent that reproduces inside the cells of living hosts. When infected, the host cell is forced to rapidly produce thousands of identical copies of the original virus. Unlike most living things, viruses do not have cells that divide; new viruses assemble in the infected host cell. But unlike simpler infectious agents like prions, they contain genes, which allow them to mutate and evolve. Over 4,800 species of viruses have been described in detail out of the millions in the environment. Their origin is unclear: some may have evolved from plasmids—pieces of DNA that can move between cells—while others may have evolved from bacteria.

The “Germ theory of disease” is the currently accepted scientific theory for many diseases. It states that microorganisms known as pathogens or “germs” can lead to disease.
“Germ” may refer to not just bacteria, but any type of microorganism: fungi, viruses, or viroids.

Germ theory in a nutshell:

Video

Science, Pseudoscience, and The Germ Theory of Disease - Dr. Jordan Grant (2022 Conference)
https://rumble.com/v13jt4t-science-pseudoscience-and-the-germ-theory-of-disease-dr.-jordan-grant-2022-.html
Dr. Jordan Grant absolutely destroys the germ theory
Spanish flu: “despite our negative results, it is nevertheless probable that the disease is transmitted by the discharge from the mouth and nose”.
The “scientists” back then tried to infect prisoners with disease from other people and they couldn’t do it.
There’s hundreds of studies like this for: measles, chicken pox, scarlet fever, colds, influenza, etc
Virus isolation: Enders 1954 - measles, gold standard: take fluid from host (blood, fecal matter, throad washing) add to milk; spin it; add to monkey kidney cells; add antibiotics (which are poisonos for the kidney cells), add calf serum, minimal nutrient; wait a few days; if cells breakdown, it is claimed to be “proof of virus”
The process ^ will break down the cells without adding any host fluids!
Other methods are way more disgusting: the doctors inject the most horrible things in animals, they take the affected tissue, grind it and inject it into other animals and repeat up to 18 times
Electron microscopy destroys the tissue. The pictures of “viruses” are just destroyed tissue.

Gallery

Not once in the history of medicine and science, has a healthy person become ill with a cold or flu when exposed to a 'virus' The classic germ theorist in the wild Goat Island sailors influenza

There would be no cases of influenza if every person in the state would do as these fifty Goat Island sailors did; namely eliminate fear of the disease.
– Glendale Evening News, February 6th, 1919

Articles

The no “Virus” challenge

https://viroliegy.com/2022/07/15/the-no-virus-challenge
https://drsambailey.com/resources/settling-the-virus-debate
https://viroliegyhome.files.wordpress.com/2022/07/settlingthevirusdebate-source.pdf

A breakdown of the problems in virology

https://steemit.com/health/@johnblaid/a-breakdown-of-the-problems-in-virology
By John Blaid, on 21-10-2021

During this past year and a half where I have spent countless of hours debating and explaining things to people, it has also pushed me into breaking things down so most if not all people can better understand about the false claims in “virology”.
This is still work in progress but it may benefit people to read through these to get more clarity about why people like myself state that the field of “virology” lack a scientific foundation and why it is both unscientific and even anti-scientific.

  • the use of cell cultures - you cannot prove that particle X is responsible for anything in a cell culture unless you have first isolated it directly from a diseased patient BEFORE any experiment AND done the proper controls

  • unproven assumptions - “virologists” always assume the alleged “viruses” are present in the samples that they use for their cell culture experiments without ever proving that the “viruses” are in fact there

  • lack of proper controls - all cell culture experiments done by “virologists” are done without proper controls that account for every variable in the experiment

  • a mix of ingredients is not isolation - “virologists” define isolation as taking an impure sample from a diseased patient and then putting it into a cell culture with toxic agents and other foreign genetic material where they starve the cells of nutrients

  • effect does not prove cause - if someone is getting ill and even dying then that isn’t evidence of a “virus”, just like a destroyed backyard is not evidence of unicorns

  • genomes are not evidence - many people assume that the published genomes of alleged “viruses” are evidence of “viruses” but that belief is based on the false assumption that “viruses” have been isolated and separated from everything else where the genomes have been sequenced directly from “viral” structures. In reality all genomes are a result of taking small genetic sequences from a mixture of genetic material where they assume that some of the sequences are “viral” where they stitch them together with the help of computers.

  • photos are not evidence - all photos of alleged “viruses” are photos taken on cell culture experiments and they can either be cell fragments of dead and dying tissue caused by the cell culture experiment prior to taking the photo or they can be artefacts produced by the procedure of taking a photo with the electron microscope

  • lack of another suspect - blaming non-existent “viruses” for various illnesses is even worse than blaming an innocent man of murder, despite the lack of evidence, just because you lack evidence of another suspect

  • misinterpretation of antibodies - people that undergo an antibody test assume that these proteins offer protection against “viruses” and that a positive result means you are “immune”, but that is not accurate

  • injection fraud - people that believe in vaccines believe they will provide protection against “viruses”, but the problem is that they can’t offer any protection against that which has never been proven to exist

  • PCR distraction - many people are arguing about the number of cycles of the PCR, but that is a distraction from the core issue which is the lack of evidence for the existence of the “virus”

Science, Pseudoscience, and The Germ Theory of disease - Dr. Jordan Grant

Published May 5, 2022
https://rumble.com/v13jt4t-science-pseudoscience-and-the-germ-theory-of-disease-dr.-jordan-grant-2022-.html
For over 150 years, the “germ theory” of disease has dominated mainstream thought regarding many illnesses. Is this theory scientific? Are there holes in the paradigm? We will explore what “science” means, first and foremost, and then apply that to dogmas surrounding contagion and infection.

Germ theory versus Terrain: the wrong side won the day

https://westonaprice.org/health-topics/notes-from-yesteryear/germ-theory-versus-terrain-the-wrong-side-won-the-day
Most probably have heard of Louis Pasteur (1822–1895), but not many are familiar with the name and work of Antoine Béchamp (1816–1908).
The two nineteenth-century researchers were scientific contemporaries, compatriots and fellow members of the French Academy of Science, but key differences in their views on biology and disease pathology led to a prolonged rivalry both within and outside of the Academy.
Béchamp was the more brilliant thinker, but Pasteur had political connections, including Emperor Napoleon III. Reportedly not above “plagiarising and distorting Béchamp’s research,” Pasteur achieved fame and fortune largely because his views “were in tune with the science and the politics of his day.” Meanwhile, mainstream medical historians relegated Béchamp’s ideas—not as attractive to conventional thinkers—to the intellectual dustbin.
Pasteur’s promotion of germ theory (a flawed notion that he did not so much “discover” as repackage) has remained “dear to pharmaceutical company executives’ hearts” up to the present day, having laid the groundwork for “synthetic drugs, chemotherapy, radiation, surgical removal of body parts and vaccines” to become the “medicine[s] of choice.” The unshakeable belief that there is one microbe for every illness is so ingrained as the “controlling medical idea for the Western world” that competing ideas about disease causation still have difficulty gaining traction.

The germ theory: A deadly fallacy

https://whatreallymakesyouill.com/germ-theory-html
By Dawn Lester, on: April 19th 2020
One of the main theories on which ‘modern medicine’ is based is the ‘germ theory’; a theory that claims microorganisms, especially bacteria and viruses, invade and infect the body, thereby causing disease. This theory, which is usually attributed to Louis Pasteur in the early 1860s, underpins a large and very significant proportion of medical practices; without it, most of modern medicine becomes redundant, which explains why the medical establishment refuses to recognise its fatal flaws. The retention of the theory is not unequivocal proof that it has been fully established and represents truth.
It is a fundamental principle that the burden of proof lies with those who propose a theory. Yet in the case of the ‘germ theory’ that ‘proof’ does not exist; there is no original scientific evidence that definitively proves that any ‘germ’ causes any specific infectious disease. Although this statement will be regarded as highly controversial and even outrageous, its veracity can be demonstrated.
People are being made to fear something that has never been proven to cause harm. It is for this reason that we urge everyone reading this to understand that the ‘germ theory’ has no basis in real science.

Say Goodbye to the Germ Theory

By Rosanne Lindsay, published December 21st, 2014
https://natureofhealing.org/say-goodbye-to-the-germ-theory

Scientist: Everything you learned about viruses is WRONG

https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2020/03/scientist-why-everything-you-learned-about-viruses-is-wrong
By Sayer Ji, on: March 3rd, 2020
Germ theory is an immensely powerful force on this planet, affecting everyday interactions from a handshake, all the way up the ladder to national vaccination agendas and global eradication campaigns.

How the microbiome undermines the ego, vaccine policy, and patriarchy

By: Sayer Ji, on: Friday, March 8th 2019 at 5:00 AM
https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/how-microbiome-destroyed-ego-vaccine-policy-and-patriarchy

Did Thomas Weller really isolate the Varicella-Zoster “virus” in 1954?

https://viroliegy.com/2022/01/16/did-thomas-weller-isolate-the-varicella-zoster-virus-in-1954
According to the CDC:
“In 1954, Thomas Weller used cell culture to isolate VZV from vesicular fluid of patients with varicella or zoster.”
https://cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/varicella.html

Thomas Rivers debunks chickenpox in 1923

https://viroliegy.com/2022/01/14/thomas-rivers-debunks-chickenpox-in-1923
https://viroliegy.com/2021/10/18/thomas-rivers-revision-of-kochs-postulates-1937

Chickenpox & Shingles: a confusing tale about the same disease caused by the same “virus” yet given different names

https://viroliegy.com/2022/01/08/chickenpox-shingles-a-confusing-tale-about-the-same-disease-caused-by-the-same-virus-yet-given-different-names
Did you know? The same virus that causes chickenpox also causes shingles. Although shingles and chickenpox are caused by the same virus, they are not the same illness.
Shingles has existed since the Middle Ages. However, the disease was often confused with smallpox, as that was one of the prevalent diseases at that time.
https://apic.org/monthly_alerts/chickenpox-versus-shingles-whats-the-difference
https://healthyliving.azcentral.com/history-of-shingles-disease-12222755.html
When looking into the history of virology, it becomes readily apparent that the same symptoms of disease are regularly given different names which are claimed to be caused by different “viruses” or bacteria.
Syphilis, HIV, and lupus. Rubella and measles. Influenza and “COVID-19”. Pneumonia and tuberculosis. Smallpox and monkeypox. And so it is with chickenpox and shingles (of which both can also be included alongside smallpox/monkeypox).

Second thoughts on the germ theory

By René J. Dubos, in Scientific American, Vol. 192, No. 5 (May 1955), pp. 31-35 (5 pages)
https://jstor.org/stable/24944640
Everyone harbors disease germs, yet not everyone is sick. This is ascribed to “resistance”, suggesting that germs are less important in disease than other factors affecting the condition of the host.

New York has America’s most bacteria-ridden subways: Germs linked to respiratory problems and skin infections are found all over city’s metro system

By Ellie Zolfagharifard, published 1 March 2016
https://dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3471754/New-York-America-s-bacteria-ridden-subways-Germs-linked-anthrax-food-poisoning-bubonic-plague-city-s-metro-system.html
There are two million colony-forming units per square inch in New York
Study also looked at Washington, Chicago, Boston, and San Francisco
Handrail transfers as much bacteria as shaking hands with 10,000 people
They found 15,152 different types of microorganisms that share the train with its 5.5 million riders.
At the time they linked these to bubonic plague, anthrax and meningitis - but the scientists have since retracted these claims – OF COURSE!

Refs

×